PW PIRKAWAKKA

Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL vs Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT

2026 Travel Trailer comparison · side-by-side specs, verdict, and who each is best for.

Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL

Dutchmen

Kodiak 280BHSL

$45,976 · 33' · sleeps 10

Full Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL details →
Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT

Highland Ridge

Colt 33RLT

$48,293 · 37'10" · sleeps 8

Full Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT details →

Quick verdict

Two bunkhouse Travel Trailer options at similar price but starkly different tow weights. The Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL spans 33 ft and 5,740 lbs dry with a 7,600 lb GVWR and 825-lb tongue weight, sleeping ten in bunkhouse plus convertible layout at $45,976. The Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT measures 37.83 ft and 8,705 lbs dry with a 10,600 lb GVWR, 1,130-lb tongue, also bunkhouse, sleeping eight, but loads on 200W solar, 50-amp shore, king bed, fireplace, theater seating, four-season build, and off-road package at $48,293.

The Kodiak 280BHSL is 4.83 ft shorter and 2,965 lbs lighter, fitting half-ton tow ratings the Colt 33RLT exceeds. The Colt 33RLT's content load justifies the modest $2,317 premium: solar, four-season insulation, king bed, fireplace, and off-road package are all absent from the Kodiak's spec sheet.

Verdict: pick the Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL for half-ton-friendly 33-ft bunkhouse touring; pick the Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT for substantially more content and shoulder-season capability in a heavier 37+ ft trailer.

Side-by-side specs

Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSLHighland Ridge Colt 33RLT
MSRP$45,976$48,293
Length33'37'10"
Dry weight5,740 lbs8,705 lbs
GVWR7,600 lbs10,600 lbs
Sleeps108
Slides
Fresh tank44 gal52 gal
Grey tank39 gal71.5 gal
Black tank28 gal39 gal
LP9.4 gal
Solar200W
Inverter
Generator
Bath
Bedking
4-seasonNoYes
Off-roadNoYes
Outdoor kitchenNoNo
Washer/dryernonenone
Residential fridgeNoNo

Where Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL wins

  • 2,965 lbs lighter dry weight (5,740 vs 8,705 lbs)
  • 4.83 ft shorter overall (33 vs 37.83 ft)
  • $2,317 lower MSRP ($45,976 vs $48,293)
  • 305-lb lighter tongue (825 vs 1,130 lbs)
  • Sleeps 10 vs Colt 33RLT's 8 capacity

Where Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT wins

  • 200W solar + 1,800W inverter (Kodiak: none listed)
  • King bed, fireplace, theater seating standard
  • Four-season build + off-road package
  • 50-amp shore vs unspecified Kodiak amperage
  • 13.5 gal more fresh + 32.5 gal more grey water

Pick the Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL if…

Half-ton truck families with three or more kids who want the lightest 33-ft bunkhouse. The Dutchmen Kodiak 280BHSL's 5,740 lb dry weight and 825-lb tongue fit modern F-150 SuperCrew, Ram 1500, and Silverado 1500 ratings with appropriate hitching. Sleeps ten via bunkhouse plus dinette conversion at $45,976. Best for summer-only families who travel to hookup campgrounds with three to four kids and prioritize tow-vehicle compatibility.

Pick the Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT if…

3/4-ton truck families who want a longer, fully-equipped bunkhouse with four-season capability. The Highland Ridge Colt 33RLT's 200W solar, fireplace, theater seating, king bed, and four-season insulation extend usable months. The 1,130-lb tongue and 10,600 lb GVWR demand a 3/4-ton tow vehicle. At $48,293 the $2,317 premium over the Kodiak buys substantial content. Best for families who actually camp in shoulder seasons and value standard solar/inverter content.

Frequently asked

What's the difference between the Kodiak 280BHSL and Colorado 280BHC?

Sister Dutchmen models on similar frames with slightly different floorplans and content. Same $45,976 MSRP, comparable tow specs; differ on bunk arrangement and trim details.

Can a 2023 F-150 SuperCrew tow the Colt 33RLT?

Marginal. The 1,130 lb tongue and 10,600 lb GVWR push half-ton ratings. A 2024+ F-250 or Ram 2500 is the safer tow.

Is four-season build in the Colt 33RLT verified?

Highland Ridge lists four-season with insulated/heated tanks. Confirm LP capacity (9.4 gal in Colt 33RLT) supports your expected furnace runtime before booking sub-freezing trips.